- Leadership - Desperately Needed!
- It’s Getting Late! It’s Now or Never
- Islamic Expansion in Texas
- Republicans Finding Common Ground
- Former Moms for Liberty Chairs in South Carolina Address Massive Departure from Organization
- Christopher Columbus - Little Known Part I
- Greenville County Holding Public Meetings on 1% Transportation Sales Tax Referendum
- Christopher Columbus - Little Known Part II
- Beyond the Monuments - Finding the Forgotten Grave of Dicey Langston
- 2026 Voting Information: Early Voting & Polling Locations
- The Myth of Voting for the Lesser of Two Evils
- Thurmond and Murkowski Won as Write-Ins. Is This Year’s Senate Race Really the Same?
- South Carolina Gas Tax Climbs From Near Bottom Nationally to 30th in 2026
- Equipping the Persecuted: Weekend Terror Alert Helped Avert Wider Massacre as Slaughter of Christians Continues to Ravage Nigeria Unchecked by Government
- Hunting Island's Lighthouse Was Built to Outsmart the Atlantic's Shifting Shoreline
Local Columnists
Getting The United States Out Of The United Nations, And The United Nations Out Of The United States: Is It Possible? - Part 1
- Details
- By W.H. Lamb
“It has been the dream of many people for over 200 years to create a one-world government over the entire planet to bring people together, thereby preventing war between nations and peoples—universal peace.
“It is a grand ideal, and many have been convinced that such an entity would indeed create universal peace. There is only one thing wrong with it, and that is that human nature and the nature of government get in the way. It recalls to mind the adage of the British Lord Acton: ‘Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’.
“The nature of government is to take unto itself more and more power, and with that power a level of corruption. There is no exception to this natural process in history, ancient or modern, because it is based on human nature and the nature of government itself.”
Art Thompson, ‘The United Nations: Unity Through Tyranny’, published by The John Birch Society through Western Islands, Appleton, Wisconsin, 2020, p. vii.
The Use of the Word Science by Evolutionists
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Evolutionists often talk about science. For example, they will often claim that evolution is science, but creation is just religion. Meanwhile, there are creationists that declared that what they are doing is science as well. They will often point to legitimate scientific distinctions such as a theory making testable predictions. That is a creationist need to present them with testable predictions from creationist theories, particularly successful ones. When we do this, then they will often start insisting that it is still not scientific because it is not totally naturalistic. Their ultimate argument against creationists, when presented evidence either against naturalistic views of origins or in favor of Biblical creation, is that it does not qualify as scientific evidence unless it has been approved by the peer review journals of institutionalized science.
Some Battles
- Details
- By Ben Graydon
I would never have believed that I would live to see the day when an election would be so openly stolen and then the mechanisms of government weaponized in plain view to trespass upon and to attempt to criminalize the political player who just had his landslide election taken from him. And the assaulting party did it with a straight face, claiming the rule of law. But we should not be surprised, for criminal activity to seize power and then to cover up its confiscation has been going on since Cain killed Abel.
It is easy to lull oneself into complacency, thinking, “They would never do THAT. This is AMERICA!” But one who continues to think that does not begin to know American history, for that is EXACTLY what has been done to us, and from America’s very beginnings. And it is the same forces of evil, if separated by generations, that seek to steal, kill and destroy, taking away from the values and the valuables that made America great. The fact that we would say or think “They would never …" indicates that we know, innately, that there IS a “they” - someone who is not US and who opposes us.
Who Are You Calling a Fascist, Mr. President?
- Details
- By David Harsanyi
The other day, President Joe Biden accused voters of the opposition party of turning to "semi-fascism." This is probably the first time in American history a president has openly attacked the opposing party's constituents in this way.
Then again, Biden, who once alleged that the chaste Mitt Romney was harboring a desire to bring back chattel slavery, is prone to stupid hyperbole. And it's true that most people who throw around the word "fascist" fail to do so with much precision. These days, the word "democracy," like "fascism," has lost all meaning. According to Democrats, asking someone to show ID before voting is an attack on "democracy," but so is the Supreme Court's handing back power to voters on the abortion issue. When you have no limiting principles of governance, anything that inhibits your exertion of power is seen as anti-"democracy." If students have loans to be paid, "forgive" them. If you can't pass a bill, the executive branch should do it by fiat. If the court stops it, pack it. Power is only to be limited when the opposition holds it.
How Science Relates to the Study of the Past
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
How good science is at studying the past is a central point to the discussion of origins. One of the primary assumptions made by evolutionists is that the past can be studied and understood as easily as the present functioning of the universe can. They seem to think that the same degree of certainty can be obtained about the present functioning of the universe and its past. They do this by ignoring the fact that while we can see how the universe operates today, we cannot observe the past. This means that studying the past requires a lot of philosophical assumptions to be applied when interpreting evidence.
Black Betrayal: Pied Pipers of Self Destruction
- Details
- By Pastor Stephen Broden, Executive Director, Content of Character Series
Tracy Abrams's recent rant that abortion is biblical is another example of how willing black leaders are to throw the community under the bus to achieve their selfish ambitions.
Nothing in the pages of the Holy Scriptures justifies the murder of innocent life. To abort a baby is the murder of innocent life by any definition. A baby is a person distinct from the mother who carries it in her womb. Often pro-abortionist scream, "my body my choice" however, the baby is not the mother's body. The gender of the baby may be different from the mother's, hair, eyes, and body type may be different from the mother. Indeed, the baby's fingerprints are different. Science indicates that the baby and the mother are distinct persons. So, why is Abrams lying to the community about abortion and conflating healthcare with the murder of babies?
Russians Ramping Up Major Campaign in Ukraine
- Details
- By Mike Scruggs
Combined Air, Rocket, and Artillery Attacks
On August 27, the Russian Federation Defense Ministry announced completion of major combined air, rocket, and artillery attacks against Ukrainian forces, It was led by Russian Air Force bombing and major rocket and artillery forces bombardment on key Ukrainian military positions. The fact that the Russian Air Force led such a significant combined attack is strongly indicative that the Russians are launching a major campaign to defeat and drive out Ukrainian forces in Eastern and Southern Ukraine. All information in war is subject to emotional bias, distortion, and perpetrated deception. A Sherlock Holmes approach to interpretation is advised.
- History Does Teach Us To Hope
- As Washington Gives Us 'More,' Americans Want 'Better'
- The Deranged Cruelties of Transgender Ideology
- The Fascists Who Live Among Us
- The Real Nature of Science
- Rushdie Stabbing Reminds Us That Iran Is Still the World's Leading Terror State
- Colonel Douglas MacGregor on Ukraine and China
Subcategories
Browse by the Top Tags ...
