- Knowing Trump
- Newberry Judge Request Sworn Medical Affidavits and Sets Near-Term Deadline in Jeff Davis Case
- “If You’ve Never Had Filet Mignon, Peanut Butter Tastes Just Fine”
- Democrat-Turned-Republican Pascoe Makes Third Appearance Before Greenville County GOP
- Compromise Reached, But Public Trust Remains Unsettled After County Administrator Vote
- Hear or See Something? Say Something: Crime Stoppers of Greenville Marks Awareness Month
- Senate Property Tax Debate Expands as Bright Pushes Broader Relief Amendment
- Ukrainian Intelligence and the Ukraine War
- Will We Ever Heed Orwell’s Warning?
- The Iranian Dilemma
- Eurobond Medicine for Ukraine
- Greenland Defense and Arctic Economic Development
- Warrior For American Independence—The Story Of “ATAYATAGHRONGHTA” (Colonel Joseph Louis Cook)
- Flat Earth, Round Earth, and the Bible’s Forgotten Clue
- MIS RAICES ESTAN AQUI!
Republican Gubernatorial Candidates Outline Competing Visions at Upstate Women’s Forum
- Details
- By James Spurck, Publisher
Four announced contenders make their case as undecided voters remain a decisive factor

Photo by Terry M. Thacker
The Upstate Republican Women’s Club and Fourth Republican District Club hosted a South Carolina Republican gubernatorial forum on February 23, 2026, bringing together party activists and voters for a structured discussion of leadership priorities ahead of the June primary.
Veteran broadcaster Jane Robelot served as moderator, emphasizing the responsibility of informed voting and encouraging attendees to evaluate not just policy positions but governing temperament. Each candidate was given time for opening remarks, policy questions, and a closing statement. Audience participation from the floor was not permitted.
S.C. Senate Moves to Expand Property Tax Homestead Exemption
- Details
- By Neil Wolin - SC Policy Council

As home value assessments rise, South Carolina residents 65 and older are increasingly calling for property tax relief.
In response, the Senate advanced S.768, the bill would expand the current $50,000 homestead exemption.
After a round of adopted and rejected amendments in committee and on the Senate floor, the bill received second and third reading, advancing the legislation to the House for consideration.
A Trio of Data Center Bills Filed in the Senate
- Details
- By Neil Wolin - SC Policy Council

Last year, the governor signed energy legislation that expedited energy projects in the state, most notably the Canady’s natural gas plant. Before signage, the House removed requirements that would protect ratepayers from massive energy infrastructure costs driven up by commercial data centers.
In the absence of these protections and heightened concerns about where and how data centers operate in the state, the Senate has introduced three new data center regulatory bills.
Nearly 80 percent of S.C. voters support data centers providing their own energy generation or paying for their own infrastructure costs, as indicated in SCPC’s recent winter poll.
Senate Property Tax Debate Expands as Bright Pushes Broader Relief Amendment
- Details
- By James Spurck, Publisher
S.768 would raise senior exemption to $150,000 as a proposed amendment seeks relief for all homeowners

Debate over property tax relief intensified this week in the South Carolina General Assembly as senators continue to consider the Senate Bill 768, a measure that would significantly expand South Carolina’s homestead exemption for seniors while also opening discussion about broader relief for all primary homeowners.
Senate Bill 768, as amended by the Senate Finance Committee, would increase the existing homestead exemption from $50,000 to $150,000 of fair market value for qualifying homeowners age 65 and older who have lived in South Carolina for at least five property tax years. Under current law, the homestead exemption applies to residents age 65 and older, as well as those who are legally blind or totally disabled, and exempts the first $50,000 of a primary residence’s fair market value from county, municipal, school, and special assessment property taxes.
FY 27: Another year of big state spending?
- Details
- By Sam Aaron - SC Policy Council

On Monday, S.C. Gov. Henry McMaster released his proposed state spending plan for fiscal year 2027, which starts July 1.
His state budget proposal outlines several familiar policy priorities, including teacher pay raises, additional infrastructure funding, and an extension of the in-state tuition freeze.
So how does this budget shape up compared to last year's final figures?
Pray Safe Bill?
- Details
- By SC Freedom Caucus
The Devil's in the Details

A bill set to be voted on TODAY in the SC House sparked a fiery debate last week.
"The Pray Safe Act" provides government grants (up to $750,000 of taxpayer cash) to qualifying “private religious organizations” for safety improvements. With the rise in attacks on churches and synagogues from gunman, arsonists, and left wing protestors this may seem like a reasonable solution.
However, the devil is in the details.
The Blue-Collar Tax Hike: See How H.4216 Hits Your Household + Immediate Action Steps
- Details
- By Alaina Moore - Palmetto State Watch

The South Carolina legislature has come back to attempt passage of H.4216 which increases taxes for lower income families and eliminates all standard and itemized deductions. Legislators tried to push this through last year, as we sounded the alarm in previous reporting, but thankfully legislators were forced by the grassroots to hold off due to clear opposition. Now, they are back to finish what they started if you don’t act soon.
The Scary Details – Reverse Robin Hood
As described by former Rep. Jonathon Hill in his latest Bad Bill Sheet, H.4216 changes the state individual income tax in four major ways:
- Establishes two tax brackets: 1.99% for all incomes up to $30,000 a year and 5.39% for all other incomes.
- Eliminates all standard and itemized deductions.
- Add a graduated deduction of up to $30,000 for those earning less than $110,000.
- Conditionally lowers the top rate by 1% per year until it reaches 1.99%.
The South Carolina Policy Council’s 2026 Winter Poll
- Details
- By Sam Aaron - SC Policy Council
With the start of 2026, the second half of the legislative session is underway. Both new and existing proposals are moving through the South Carolina Statehouse. To provide lawmakers, members of the media, and the public with the most up-to-date insight into where likely South Carolina voters stand on key issues, such as taxes, judicial reform, and energy policy, the South Carolina Policy Council is releasing its latest policy poll.
The poll was conducted from January 24 to February 1 among 1,200 registered voters.
Taxes & Spending
This year, tax reform dominated the conversation at the Statehouse. Income tax reform, in particular, took center stage, with lawmakers debating whether to reduce or eliminate the tax altogether. But what do South Carolina voters think?
72% of voters supported reducing or eliminating the state income tax.
Columbia Thinks More Taxes, Not Concrete Will Fix Roads
- Details
- By SC Freedom Caucus
Twenty-three lawmakers appointed by the Speaker to a special Committee traveled across the state (on your dime) for 6 public hearings to determine how to fix South Carolina’s crumbling roads.
Their answer—they need more of your money. No joke.
What was sold as a major Department of Transportation reform bill is in fact a confused amalgamation of tax hikes, long-overdue common sense reforms, and fiscally irresponsible proposals that would make matters worse.
Not to be outdone, the SC Senate has their own DOT reform bill that is even worse.
Palmetto Family Alliance Statement on H. 4756
- Details
- By Palmetto Family Alliance
COLUMBIA, S.C. – Palmetto Family Alliance President Steve Pettit issued the following statement regarding H. 4756, the South Carolina Student Physical Privacy Act, which is being considered in a subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee today:
“As South Carolina’s leading voice for biblical values, Palmetto Family Alliance strongly supports H. 4756, the South Carolina Student Physical Privacy Act. This commonsense legislation upholds the dignity, safety, and privacy of students in public schools and higher education institutions by ensuring that restrooms, changing facilities, and sleeping quarters are designated and used based on biological sex.
Statehouse Update January 13-15
- Details
- By Brendan Connors - SC Policy Council

The second half of the 2025-26 legislative session starts this week. Lawmakers are wasting no time picking up where they left off—and we’re right alongside them. Each week, the Policy Council will bring you updates on legislation dealing with the budget, tax relief, government transparency, and other issues that matter most to the success of our great state. As of Monday, January 12, here are the bills we are keeping an eye on.
2026 Legislative Priorities
- Details
- By SC Freedom Caucus
Closed Primaries - H.3310
By a margin of more than 80%, the voters of South Carolina have repeatedly told the legislature that they want closed partisan primaries. Yet despite the bill to do so being filed for more than 20 years, we’ve never even received a subcommittee meeting until now. The external pressure from voters and the actions of the SCFC inside the chamber have led to the closed primary bill, H 3310, being scheduled for a hearing on January 15th at 9am. That’s the good news. Here’s the bad news…
The House rules state that all committee meetings automatically adjourn at 10am when we start session on the floor of the House. Those in leadership who oppose closed primaries decided to use this rule to try and thwart the will of the voters by placing 3 other bills ahead of H 3310 on the committee schedule. If the hour runs out without a vote on 3310, then it will not move on to full committee or the floor for a vote.
Petitions, Protests, and Power Bills: Spartanburg Faces Data Center Debacle
- Details
- By Palmetto State Watch Foundation

As South Carolina continues to be flooded with data center proposals, Spartanburg County citizens have decided to push back. Following a heated county council meeting, a petition has sparked renewed scrutiny over how these facilities are approved, who benefits from them, and who bears the costs. At the center of the debate are familiar questions that this outlet raised just last month: taxpayer-subsidized infrastructure, rising utility demands, and the issue of local government spending taxpayer money to raise the costs of utilities on said taxpayers.
Time to Act: Equal Protection Bill Scheduled for January 14th Hearing in Columbia
- Details
- By United Patriots Alliance

Ready to pass meaningful anti-abortion legislation that will rid South Carolina of abortion once and for all? Now is the time to act. The South Carolina Prenatal Equal Protection Act (H.3537) is scheduled for a hearing in Constitutional Laws Subcommittee this Wednesday, January 14th at 12pm in Room 110 of the Blatt Building. You can view the agenda HERE.
Interestingly, the “pro-life” establishment’s bill (H.4760) is scheduled to be heard right before the equal protection bill.
S.C. Commerce Seeking Money for Program with Ties to Scout Motors
- Details
- By Rick Brundrett - The Nerve

The S.C. Department of Commerce has submitted a total of nearly $80 million in state spending requests for next fiscal year, including $28.5 million for a program with ties to the Scout Motors project in Richland County.
In its annual “Agency Budget Plan” submitted to the S.C. Department of Administration, Commerce is seeking $25 million in nonrecurring funds and $3.5 million in recurring funding for “LocateSC,” which, according to a Commerce spokeswoman, supports the agency’s “recruitment efforts” by “making sites competitive for industrial development.”
In reviewing the agency’s total $79.9 million in general-fund requests for the 2026-27 fiscal year, which starts next July 1, The Nerve requested updated LocateSC spending records since fiscal year 2018.
State costs grow to $12.5M related to probes of disputed $1.8B
- Details
- By Rick Brundrett - The Nerve

The state-funded tab for investigations of and other matters related to the disputed $1.8 billion has grown to more than $12.5 million, according to the latest records reviewed by The Nerve.
The new tally, which is based on records obtained under the S.C. Freedom of Information Act, is nearly $1.3 million, or 11%, more than the total revealed by The Nerve in August.
To put the $12.52 million into perspective, it’s more than the entire current budgets of at least 19 state agencies or major divisions. That includes, for example, the State Ethics and Public Service commissions, Inspector General’s and Secretary of State’s offices, and the Legislative Audit Council – the General Assembly’s investigative arm.
It’s also more than the overall budgets of the State Auditor’s and Comptroller General’s offices – two of the six agencies that have racked up legal fees or other costs in connection with the disputed $1.8 billion or related issues.




