Abiogenesis does not qualify as science largely because it does not meet any of the main qualifications to be considered science. It is not based on observation, in fact, it is contrary to observation. It is not repeatable because if it happened it is a one-off event in the past for which there is no actual information. Ultimately it doesn't qualify as science because it is fundamentally untestable. Not only because it cannot be observed but because even if it can be proven impossible here on Earth it can always possible to move it to some distant place and time that makes testing it impossible.
- Ten Toes In: Why Trump Accounts Make Sense for North Carolina's Small Businesses
- Remnant Called -
- Back to Basics: Understanding Your Greenville County Property Tax Bill from Start to Finish
- Same Job. Two Résumés. Graham and Norman Make Their Case for the US Senate
- The Republic of Türkiye and the Iran War
- AIPAC Lobbyists Grip on Congress
- The Ukrainian Drone Attacks on Wildberries
- American Independence and the Battle of Cowpens
- Turkish Naval Force Deploys in Eastern Mediterranean
- Greenville Republican Women's Monthly Luncheon - July 2026
- Briefing Notes from the Ukraine and Persian Gulf Wars
- Hunting Island's Lighthouse Was Built to Outsmart the Atlantic's Shifting Shoreline
- Saudi Arabia’s Iran War Dilemma
- ChristianPremaritalCounseling.com Launches Nationwide Online Premarital Counseling for Engaged Christian Couples
- Remembering Senator Lindsey Graham
Conclusion on Reasons Abiogenesis cannot be Considered Science
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.

