Abiogenesis does not qualify as science largely because it does not meet any of the main qualifications to be considered science. It is not based on observation, in fact, it is contrary to observation. It is not repeatable because if it happened it is a one-off event in the past for which there is no actual information. Ultimately it doesn't qualify as science because it is fundamentally untestable. Not only because it cannot be observed but because even if it can be proven impossible here on Earth it can always possible to move it to some distant place and time that makes testing it impossible.
- Embedded in America
- Seek Protection and Guidance
- The Art of The Deal
- Smarter and Better People: Aristotle, James Henley Thornwell, and the Moral-Intellectual Nexus
- When Columbia Passes Gas, the Cost Doesn’t Just Dissipate into Thin Air
- It’s Not Just About Crime: What the Attorney General Debate in Pickens Revealed
- Residency Lawsuit Against Greenville Councilman Ennis Fant Expands into Criminal Review Dispute
- Stumbo Sounds Alarm on THC, Repeat Offenders, and Cartel Crime in Greenville Appearance
- Back-to-Basics Breakfast Brings a Plate Full of Legislative Bites
- Vengeance Belongs to the Lord
- Truth Versus Propaganda Narratives
- Iran War Commentary and Notes
- Happy Resurrection Sunday!
- Christian Principles of War and Foreign Policy
- Lamar Advertising Refuses to Display Stanton Healthcare’s Billboard Campaign Offering Abortion Pill Reversal for Women
Conclusion on Reasons Abiogenesis cannot be Considered Science
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.

