Abiogenesis does not qualify as science largely because it does not meet any of the main qualifications to be considered science. It is not based on observation, in fact, it is contrary to observation. It is not repeatable because if it happened it is a one-off event in the past for which there is no actual information. Ultimately it doesn't qualify as science because it is fundamentally untestable. Not only because it cannot be observed but because even if it can be proven impossible here on Earth it can always possible to move it to some distant place and time that makes testing it impossible.
- Leadership - Desperately Needed!
- It’s Getting Late! It’s Now or Never
- Islamic Expansion in Texas
- Republicans Finding Common Ground
- Christopher Columbus - Little Known Part I
- Christopher Columbus - Little Known Part II
- Former Moms for Liberty Chairs in South Carolina Address Massive Departure from Organization
- 2026 Voting Information: Early Voting & Polling Locations
- Greenville County Holding Public Meetings on 1% Transportation Sales Tax Referendum
- Beyond the Monuments - Finding the Forgotten Grave of Dicey Langston
- The Myth of Voting for the Lesser of Two Evils
- Thurmond and Murkowski Won as Write-Ins. Is This Year’s Senate Race Really the Same?
- Writing In Ralph Norman Is Writing Off His Own Judgment
- Equipping the Persecuted: Weekend Terror Alert Helped Avert Wider Massacre as Slaughter of Christians Continues to Ravage Nigeria Unchecked by Government
- A Billion-Dollar Question: The Penny Is Retiring, but the Penny Tax Proposal Hasn't?
Conclusion on Reasons Abiogenesis cannot be Considered Science
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.

