Abiogenesis does not qualify as science largely because it does not meet any of the main qualifications to be considered science. It is not based on observation, in fact, it is contrary to observation. It is not repeatable because if it happened it is a one-off event in the past for which there is no actual information. Ultimately it doesn't qualify as science because it is fundamentally untestable. Not only because it cannot be observed but because even if it can be proven impossible here on Earth it can always possible to move it to some distant place and time that makes testing it impossible.
- Ten Toes In: Why Trump Accounts Make Sense for North Carolina's Small Businesses
- Remnant Called -
- Former Moms for Liberty Chairs in South Carolina Address Massive Departure from Organization
- Same Job. Two Résumés. Graham and Norman Make Their Case for the US Senate
- Back to Basics: Understanding Your Greenville County Property Tax Bill from Start to Finish
- AIPAC Lobbyists Grip on Congress
- The Myth of Voting for the Lesser of Two Evils
- Hunting Island's Lighthouse Was Built to Outsmart the Atlantic's Shifting Shoreline
- The Ukrainian Drone Attacks on Wildberries
- Beyond the Monuments - Finding the Forgotten Grave of Dicey Langston
- South Carolina Gas Tax Climbs From Near Bottom Nationally to 30th in 2026
- Greenville County Holding Public Meetings on 1% Transportation Sales Tax Referendum
- Briefing Notes from the Ukraine and Persian Gulf Wars
- Saudi Arabia’s Iran War Dilemma
- Correcting Widespread Misconceptions about the Vietnam War
Conclusion on Reasons Abiogenesis cannot be Considered Science
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.

