Abiogenesis does not qualify as science largely because it does not meet any of the main qualifications to be considered science. It is not based on observation, in fact, it is contrary to observation. It is not repeatable because if it happened it is a one-off event in the past for which there is no actual information. Ultimately it doesn't qualify as science because it is fundamentally untestable. Not only because it cannot be observed but because even if it can be proven impossible here on Earth it can always possible to move it to some distant place and time that makes testing it impossible.
- Trump IS fighting for the life of our Nation
- Spinning the Catholic Killer's Bio
- Can't Sit Still Pop a Pill (Part I)
- Avenging Charlie Kirk: The Conservative Redemption of Liberal Academia
- Top 20 Nations Ranked by 2025 GDP (PPP)
- Tennessee and the Return to Common Sense: Historical Education is in Fact Safety
- The American Spectator
- Congress Takes a Holiday from Oversight
- Leibniz and Calhoun: The Christian March of Progress and Postmillennial Truth
- A Seat at the Table, Not Just a Chair in the Room
- Mainstream Media Lies about Project Ukraine
- National Debt to GDP Ratios Survey
- Venezuela Briefing 9-15-2025
- Now We Must Ask: ‘QUO VADIS” America?
- Ukraine War Update September 22, 2025
Conclusion on Reasons Abiogenesis cannot be Considered Science
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.

