Abiogenesis does not qualify as science largely because it does not meet any of the main qualifications to be considered science. It is not based on observation, in fact, it is contrary to observation. It is not repeatable because if it happened it is a one-off event in the past for which there is no actual information. Ultimately it doesn't qualify as science because it is fundamentally untestable. Not only because it cannot be observed but because even if it can be proven impossible here on Earth it can always possible to move it to some distant place and time that makes testing it impossible.
- Ten Toes In: Why Trump Accounts Make Sense for North Carolina's Small Businesses
- Remnant Called -
- It’s Getting Late! It’s Now or Never
- Leadership - Desperately Needed!
- Islamic Expansion in Texas
- Former Moms for Liberty Chairs in South Carolina Address Massive Departure from Organization
- Greenville County Holding Public Meetings on 1% Transportation Sales Tax Referendum
- Same Job. Two Résumés. Graham and Norman Make Their Case for the US Senate
- Beyond the Monuments - Finding the Forgotten Grave of Dicey Langston
- The Myth of Voting for the Lesser of Two Evils
- AIPAC Lobbyists Grip on Congress
- Equipping the Persecuted: Weekend Terror Alert Helped Avert Wider Massacre as Slaughter of Christians Continues to Ravage Nigeria Unchecked by Government
- Hunting Island's Lighthouse Was Built to Outsmart the Atlantic's Shifting Shoreline
- South Carolina Gas Tax Climbs From Near Bottom Nationally to 30th in 2026
- Thurmond and Murkowski Won as Write-Ins. Is This Year’s Senate Race Really the Same?
Conclusion on Reasons Abiogenesis cannot be Considered Science
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.

