Abiogenesis does not qualify as science largely because it does not meet any of the main qualifications to be considered science. It is not based on observation, in fact, it is contrary to observation. It is not repeatable because if it happened it is a one-off event in the past for which there is no actual information. Ultimately it doesn't qualify as science because it is fundamentally untestable. Not only because it cannot be observed but because even if it can be proven impossible here on Earth it can always possible to move it to some distant place and time that makes testing it impossible.
- A Leader like George Washington
- Embedded in America
- Seek Protection and Guidance
- The Art of The Deal
- Smarter and Better People: Aristotle, James Henley Thornwell, and the Moral-Intellectual Nexus
- Subscribe to Times Examiner Weekly Briefings
- Republican Gubernatorial Candidates Outline Competing Visions at Upstate Women’s Forum
- From Sewer Expansion to Six-Figure Sanctions
- Property Rights vs. Property Rights? Greenville County Weighs Short-Term Rental Rules
- It’s Not Just About Crime: What the Attorney General Debate in Pickens Revealed
- Residency Lawsuit Against Greenville Councilman Ennis Fant Expands into Criminal Review Dispute
- Stumbo Sounds Alarm on THC, Repeat Offenders, and Cartel Crime in Greenville Appearance
- When Columbia Passes Gas, the Cost Doesn’t Just Dissipate into Thin Air
- Back-to-Basics Breakfast Brings a Plate Full of Legislative Bites
- Immigration Enforcement
Conclusion on Reasons Abiogenesis cannot be Considered Science
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.

