Abiogenesis does not qualify as science largely because it does not meet any of the main qualifications to be considered science. It is not based on observation, in fact, it is contrary to observation. It is not repeatable because if it happened it is a one-off event in the past for which there is no actual information. Ultimately it doesn't qualify as science because it is fundamentally untestable. Not only because it cannot be observed but because even if it can be proven impossible here on Earth it can always possible to move it to some distant place and time that makes testing it impossible.
- The Purpose of your Life -
- Revisiting the Great Work of Medical Missionary Dr. Anne Livingston in Haiti
- "I Beat Hitler!"
- Dick Cheney Was a Great Boss
- Has the Bethlehem Star Mystery Been Unveiled?
- Appeals Court Refuses to Dismiss Greenville County Republican Chairman’s Contempt Case
- U.S. Tomahawk Missiles and Ukraine
- Get US Out! of the USMCA
- The Battle for Pokrovsk
- Teachers’ Unions’ Backing of Radical ‘No Kings’ Rallies Speaks Volumes about America’s Education System
- Christmas Season in Western North Carolina
- Public Advocate CEO Eugene Delgaudio Asks President Trump to Punish Discover - Debanking Link to Southern Poverty Law Center Cited
- The Busan Trade Summit between U.S. and China
- Project Ukraine and Ukrainian/CIA Intelligence
- Tariffs in American History
Conclusion on Reasons Abiogenesis cannot be Considered Science
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.

