Abiogenesis does not qualify as science largely because it does not meet any of the main qualifications to be considered science. It is not based on observation, in fact, it is contrary to observation. It is not repeatable because if it happened it is a one-off event in the past for which there is no actual information. Ultimately it doesn't qualify as science because it is fundamentally untestable. Not only because it cannot be observed but because even if it can be proven impossible here on Earth it can always possible to move it to some distant place and time that makes testing it impossible.
- Plato and Calhoun: The Quest for Best Government and the Voice of God
- Youth Sports and Character Development
- Youth Sports and Character Development (Part II)
- Member of European Parliament Speak
- Lessons from Last Presidential Election
- Trump IS fighting for the life of our Nation
- Top 20 Nations Ranked by 2025 GDP (PPP)
- Spinning the Catholic Killer's Bio
- Ukraine War Update 8-3-2025
- Can't Sit Still Pop a Pill (Part I)
- Will Voters Send a Mandated Message to the SC State Senate in 2026?
- Political Storm Clouds in the Caucasus
- Tennessee and the Return to Common Sense: Historical Education is in Fact Safety
- Mainstream Media Lies about Project Ukraine
- Avenging Charlie Kirk: The Conservative Redemption of Liberal Academia
Conclusion on Reasons Abiogenesis cannot be Considered Science
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.