- Spinning the Catholic Killer's Bio
- Can't Sit Still Pop a Pill (Part I)
- Avenging Charlie Kirk: The Conservative Redemption of Liberal Academia
- Top 20 Nations Ranked by 2025 GDP (PPP)
- Tennessee and the Return to Common Sense: Historical Education is in Fact Safety
- The American Spectator
- Congress Takes a Holiday from Oversight
- Leibniz and Calhoun: The Christian March of Progress and Postmillennial Truth
- A Seat at the Table, Not Just a Chair in the Room
- Mainstream Media Lies about Project Ukraine
- National Debt to GDP Ratios Survey
- Venezuela Briefing 9-15-2025
- Now We Must Ask: ‘QUO VADIS” America?
- Ukraine War Update September 22, 2025
- The Direction of American Religion
Is There Any Evidence for Biblical Creation Part 5
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
One strong piece of evidence for Biblical creation that came out of the RATE project. Part of this project involved testing a very important assumption of radiometric dating. The assumption tested was that atomic decay rates are constant for each isotope. This is an important experiment because if nuclear decay rates were greatly accelerated at any time in the past radiometric dating would be completely invalid.
The research started with radioactive uranium isotopes and their decay products measured in the zircon crystals found in granite. The key to testing The assumption of radiometric dating is the diffusion rate of helium out of zircon crystals based on the amount a radiometric decay that has been estimated to have occurred in the subsequent helium produced over the amount of time that the crystals have existed. The scientists doing this research created models based on both time periods. One was a uniform rate of decay over the approximately 1 1/2 billion years that zircons were dated to. The other was 2 periods of accelerated nuclear decay during the Biblical time scale. These two events would have been during the creation week and the genesis flood.
Is There Any Evidence for Biblical Creation - Part 4
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
One piece of evidence of Biblical Creation that has gotten better as the topic has been researched is planetary magnetic fields. Called “Dynamic Decay Theory,” this model started with the observed decay in the Earth's magnetic field, and it has led to a complete model planetary magnetic field. This model not only explains aspects of these magnetic fields that the uniformitarian dynamo theory cannot explain, but it also does a better job predicting planetary magnetic fields.
Is There Any Evidence for Biblical Creation - Part 3
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
For the first actual piece of evidence for the Biblical creation we will discuss the single biggest piece of evidence for the Genesis Flood. That piece of evidence is the fossil record. But the fossil record is used to support evolution you may say. It is true that is because they interpret it under the presupposition of universal common descent evolution. At its core, the fossil record is actually a record of the Genesis Flood.
To understand how the fossil record is fundamentally evidence for the Genesis Flood, it is first necessary to understand that this flood if it occurred would have been global in scale and not some teeny weenie local flood. Then it is necessary to consider what would be the primary thing we would expect if there had been a global flood sometime in the past. The primary piece of evidence would be billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the Earth. This is actually a perfect description of the fossil record.
Is There Any Evidence for Biblical Creation Part 2
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Before diving into actual evidence for Biblical creation and the Genesis Flood, it is necessary to discuss the differences between how creationists and evolutionists see evidence. These differences result from fundamental differences in the worldview behind the position. Creationists start with God, the Bible, and the implications of God as the intelligent designer and creator of the world and all that is in it. Evolutions, on the other hand, look at evidence from what is essentially an atheistic naturalistic materialistic perspective. While many evolutionists also believe in God, they still look at the evidence from this perspective. If they see any role for Him at all, it is little more than a guiding force. However, it is these differences that explain much of the disagreement between how creationists and evolutionists see evidence.
Is There Any Evidence for Biblical Creation Part 1
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
A common claim made by evolutionists is that there is no evidence for creation or a global flood. However, when you look at creationist websites or other material, they show loads of evidence. So, what is the cause of this disparity?
The first thing to note is that evolutionists have been presented the evidence exclusively from an atheistic naturalistic materialistic perspective. This is regardless of whether or not the person actually believes in God, they have been trained where they went to school to see the evidence exclusively from an atheistic naturalistic materialistic perspective. Furthermore, only explanations based on that perspective are provided with the evidence being interpreted for them through those explanations. In other words, one reason they think there is no evidence for creation, or a global flood, is because it was never shown the evidence from the perspective where either of these events would even be possible explanations. Unfortunately, in many cases, their hearts have been so hardened against any alternative that they will never be even capable of looking at the evidence from a Biblical perspective.
Why do Genetic Algorithms Show Natural Selection to be Unworkable?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Natural selection is frequently used by evolutionists as a magic wand that can accomplish anything that they need to. However, the capacities of natural selection are assumed and the most critical have never actually been demonstrated. Genetic algorithms, a type of computer program that uses a selection process to search through possibilities for a solution, have been touted by evolutionists as evidence that natural selection can make universal common descent evolution possible. However, when these algorithms are analyzed and compared to natural selection, they show that natural selection is completely incapable of doing the job the evolutionists require of it.
Do Creationists Hold a Conspiracy Theory?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
The charge is sometimes made the creation is claim that evolutionary scientists in the government are hiding evidence in support of Biblical creation. While there may be some that take this kind of position, they are a definite minority. This claim requires a couple of false ideas. The first is that interpreting evidence is 100% objective and that some powerful evolutionists see the truth and are hiding it from people. Neither one of these is true, nor doesn't need to be for creation to be correct.
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on Natural Phenomenon?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
An evolutionary perspective on natural phenomenon is essentially that only natural phenomenon exists. This is an inherently atheistic view of reality that throws out much of what is described in the Bible before ever looking at any evidence. By its very nature, this view of reality excludes from consideration such events as Creation and the Genesis Flood. Even a more subtle perspective such as intelligent design cannot be considered because ultimately the intelligent designer has to be beyond nature it has to be excluded if you only accept natural phenomena.
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on Supernatural Phenomenon?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
The key to understanding the evolutionist perspective on the supernatural is the fact that the entire idea behind universal common descent evolution and its related theories is the entirely atheistic and naturalistic notion that supernatural phenomenon does not exist. It includes the idea that the supernatural is just something ignorant people call stuff not yet explained by science. The idea is that everything eventually can be explained by science. It also includes a totally atheistic naturalistic perspective on science, which excludes anything but completely naturalistic explanations.
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on God?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
The views of individual evolutionists on God vary, from theistic evolution to absolute atheism. However, the general evolutionist perspective is to ignore God as much as possible. The Entire point of universal common descent evolution is to explain the origin of the diversity of life along with man from entirely naturalistic and atheistic notion of abiogenesis universal common descent evolution, is to explain our origin apart from God.
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on Peer Review?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
In general, from the standpoint of evolutionist a paper being peer reviewed and published by the right type of publication Has about the same effect as something being blessed by the Pope goes to a Roman Catholic. In the opinion of many of them it is the distinguishing factor between science and non-science regardless of well the scientific method is actually followed. It is frequently used as a way to excuse denying evidence that goes against the Big Bang to man evolutionary story.
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on Evidence?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Evolutionists talk a lot about evidence, but they really do not mean an objective look at the evidence. More often than not wherever evolutionists talk about evidence they talk about what has already been accepted as such by the evolutionary community. This includes not just the actual physical evidence, but it also involves confusing evidence for the interpretation of evidence.
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on Science?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
From the perspective of most evolutionists, science is the only acceptable source of knowledge. However, they do not define what is and is not science based on use of the scientific method but by drawing conclusions that agree with The Big Bang to me evolutionary mythology. It is further not considered science unless it is approved by acceptable sources that promote this is essentially atheistic worldview.
What is the evolutionist perspective on the word “evolutionist?”
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
One of the biggest ironies about evolutionists is the tendency for them to reject the word “evolutionist.” At first glance it seems hard to understand after all it is a useful term for describing somebody who accepts the notion not just of universal common descent evolution but the entire Big Bang to man evolutionary mythology. Even more, they refused to give a meaningful alternative that could be used in its place.
It is not uncommon when referring to evolutionists online, for them to criticize the use of the word “evolutionist.” They claim that it is a word invented by and only used by creationists to make evolution look like some look like a belief system when it is supposedly based on evidence. The problem is the fact that the word “evolutionist” can be found in dictionaries both on and offline along with the definition of belief.
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on Creationists?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
While evolutionists are not completely monolithic and how they view creationists, there is a general pattern for those that you encounter online. This pattern of thinking is also common among theological liberals and political leftists. Besides the fact that there is a tenancy for there to be overlap between these groups, there's a definite tendency among them towards intellectual snobbery.
Among evolutionists, there is definitely a large degree of contempt for creationists, particularly anyone who is actively supporting evolutionary theory. They will often accuse us of denying science and denying evidence while doing exactly what they accuse us of doing. Most evolutionists seem incapable of realizing that there is any way of looking at the data and evidence other than an atheistic evolutionary perspective.
Digital Physics, the Supernatural and Biblical Creation
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Digital physics is the idea that our universe is fundamentally programmed information system Making it much like a virtual reality. This idea easily explains many aspects of quantum mechanics that otherwise seem quite bizarre. It also explains how there could be supernatural phenomena while providing a mechanism for Biblical creation.
And all the aspects of Quantum Mechanics that make it seem weird only do so when you are looking at the world from a materialistic perspective. Looking at it instead has a programmed information system. For example, Planck length and Planck time our units of space and time beneath which it is impossible to measure anything, making space and time effectively pixelated like you would in a video game. Furthermore, the behavior of subsonic particles changes depending on the availability of information about them. For example, particles of matter exhibit both particle-like properties as well as wavelike properties.
Browse by the Top Tags ...
