- Timmons Expresses Support for DEI’s Doppelganger for Hiring Practices in Washington
- Should the US Rethink Its Mid-East Policies?
- Is Another Child Tax Credit Expansion Really the Best Way To Help Families?
- The Two-State Solution for Israel is No Solution at All
- A New Fiscal Commission Must Heed the Lesson of '97
- Biden's Corporate Tax Hike: Populism Versus Economic Literacy
- The Evils of Socialism
- Why is Greenville County Council Pickpocketing Us Again?
- The Morgan and Timmons Firey Faceoff in SC’s 4th Congressional District Race
- Advertising Rates and Specifications
- Danger: The Proposed South Carolina "Health Czar" Legislation will be Hazardous to Your FREEDOM!
- The Tucker Carlson Interview of Russian President Vladimir Putin
- Belgrade, NATO Expansion, Color Revolutions
- Insights into the Russian View of Russian History
- The Changing Balance of Power
Why do Genetic Algorithms Show Natural Selection to be Unworkable?
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Natural selection is frequently used by evolutionists as a magic wand that can accomplish anything that they need to. However, the capacities of natural selection are assumed and the most critical have never actually been demonstrated. Genetic algorithms, a type of computer program that uses a selection process to search through possibilities for a solution, have been touted by evolutionists as evidence that natural selection can make universal common descent evolution possible. However, when these algorithms are analyzed and compared to natural selection, they show that natural selection is completely incapable of doing the job the evolutionists require of it.
- Hits: 403
Do Creationists Hold a Conspiracy Theory?
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
The charge is sometimes made the creation is claim that evolutionary scientists in the government are hiding evidence in support of Biblical creation. While there may be some that take this kind of position, they are a definite minority. This claim requires a couple of false ideas. The first is that interpreting evidence is 100% objective and that some powerful evolutionists see the truth and are hiding it from people. Neither one of these is true, nor doesn't need to be for creation to be correct.
- Hits: 467
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on Natural Phenomenon?
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
An evolutionary perspective on natural phenomenon is essentially that only natural phenomenon exists. This is an inherently atheistic view of reality that throws out much of what is described in the Bible before ever looking at any evidence. By its very nature, this view of reality excludes from consideration such events as Creation and the Genesis Flood. Even a more subtle perspective such as intelligent design cannot be considered because ultimately the intelligent designer has to be beyond nature it has to be excluded if you only accept natural phenomena.
- Hits: 445
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on Supernatural Phenomenon?
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
The key to understanding the evolutionist perspective on the supernatural is the fact that the entire idea behind universal common descent evolution and its related theories is the entirely atheistic and naturalistic notion that supernatural phenomenon does not exist. It includes the idea that the supernatural is just something ignorant people call stuff not yet explained by science. The idea is that everything eventually can be explained by science. It also includes a totally atheistic naturalistic perspective on science, which excludes anything but completely naturalistic explanations.
- Hits: 486
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on God?
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
The views of individual evolutionists on God vary, from theistic evolution to absolute atheism. However, the general evolutionist perspective is to ignore God as much as possible. The Entire point of universal common descent evolution is to explain the origin of the diversity of life along with man from entirely naturalistic and atheistic notion of abiogenesis universal common descent evolution, is to explain our origin apart from God.
- Hits: 491
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on Peer Review?
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
In general, from the standpoint of evolutionist a paper being peer reviewed and published by the right type of publication Has about the same effect as something being blessed by the Pope goes to a Roman Catholic. In the opinion of many of them it is the distinguishing factor between science and non-science regardless of well the scientific method is actually followed. It is frequently used as a way to excuse denying evidence that goes against the Big Bang to man evolutionary story.
- Hits: 431
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on Evidence?
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Evolutionists talk a lot about evidence, but they really do not mean an objective look at the evidence. More often than not wherever evolutionists talk about evidence they talk about what has already been accepted as such by the evolutionary community. This includes not just the actual physical evidence, but it also involves confusing evidence for the interpretation of evidence.
- Hits: 553
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on Science?
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
From the perspective of most evolutionists, science is the only acceptable source of knowledge. However, they do not define what is and is not science based on use of the scientific method but by drawing conclusions that agree with The Big Bang to me evolutionary mythology. It is further not considered science unless it is approved by acceptable sources that promote this is essentially atheistic worldview.
- Hits: 557
What is the evolutionist perspective on the word “evolutionist?”
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
One of the biggest ironies about evolutionists is the tendency for them to reject the word “evolutionist.” At first glance it seems hard to understand after all it is a useful term for describing somebody who accepts the notion not just of universal common descent evolution but the entire Big Bang to man evolutionary mythology. Even more, they refused to give a meaningful alternative that could be used in its place.
It is not uncommon when referring to evolutionists online, for them to criticize the use of the word “evolutionist.” They claim that it is a word invented by and only used by creationists to make evolution look like some look like a belief system when it is supposedly based on evidence. The problem is the fact that the word “evolutionist” can be found in dictionaries both on and offline along with the definition of belief.
- Hits: 609
What is the Evolutionist Perspective on Creationists?
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
While evolutionists are not completely monolithic and how they view creationists, there is a general pattern for those that you encounter online. This pattern of thinking is also common among theological liberals and political leftists. Besides the fact that there is a tenancy for there to be overlap between these groups, there's a definite tendency among them towards intellectual snobbery.
Among evolutionists, there is definitely a large degree of contempt for creationists, particularly anyone who is actively supporting evolutionary theory. They will often accuse us of denying science and denying evidence while doing exactly what they accuse us of doing. Most evolutionists seem incapable of realizing that there is any way of looking at the data and evidence other than an atheistic evolutionary perspective.
- Hits: 547
Digital Physics, the Supernatural and Biblical Creation
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Digital physics is the idea that our universe is fundamentally programmed information system Making it much like a virtual reality. This idea easily explains many aspects of quantum mechanics that otherwise seem quite bizarre. It also explains how there could be supernatural phenomena while providing a mechanism for Biblical creation.
And all the aspects of Quantum Mechanics that make it seem weird only do so when you are looking at the world from a materialistic perspective. Looking at it instead has a programmed information system. For example, Planck length and Planck time our units of space and time beneath which it is impossible to measure anything, making space and time effectively pixelated like you would in a video game. Furthermore, the behavior of subsonic particles changes depending on the availability of information about them. For example, particles of matter exhibit both particle-like properties as well as wavelike properties.
- Hits: 525
Can a Supernatural Hypothesis be Falsifiable?
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
One of the main ways that evolutionists try to claim the creation science is not science is by insisting that science only allows for naturalistic explanations. This is usually justified by claiming that supernatural explanations are not falsifiable. The real reason for insisting that only naturalistic explanations is the fact that only naturalistic explanations are acceptable to atheists, and they seem to have undue influence within the establishment scientific community.
- Hits: 721
Why Natural Selection Is To Broad for Universal Common Descent to Work
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
In order for the notion of universal common descent evolution to be true there needs to be a mechanism capable of producing the many gigabytes are complex specific information that is found throughout the DNA of all living things. No natural process has ever actually been demonstrated to be capable of accomplishing this task. The solution proposed by Charles Darwin and blindly accepted as workable by evolutionists to this day is called Natural Selection. The problem is that there is no real evidence that it really exists let alone that it is capable of what is subscribed to it.
- Hits: 582
Does Information Require an Author?
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
This question is important because DNA contains information, in fact, it contains complex specific encoded information. The answer to this question depends entirely upon which type of information you are referring to. Understanding this difference is the key to understanding why a naturalistic origin of life is fundamentally unworkable and impossible.
- Hits: 659
Do Genetic Algorithms Show That Intelligence is Not Needed to Produce Information?
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
A genetic algorithm is a search algorithm that seeks optimization by random changes within a population of solutions. They are alleged to mimic natural selection and because of this they are used as evidence of universal common descent evolution being possible and claimed as proof that information need not be the product of an intelligent mind. However, when one looks closely and objectively at these algorithms, they actually do the opposite.
- Hits: 582
Statistical Versus Complex Specific Information
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
In talking about whether or not genetic information suggests an intelligent designer, Evolutionists will often refer to the paper on information theory by Claude Shannon called “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”. They use it primarily to attack the idea that random mutations reduce genetic information. However, it turns out that they are confusing statistical information with complex specific information.
Shannon’s paper with a mathematical description of the transmission and storage of information. It does not deal with information content. In other words, his paper deals exclusively with statistical information which may or may not have any meaning. Complex specific information on the other hand has specific meaning and is only known to be the result directly or indirectly of intelligence.
- Hits: 833