- Spinning the Catholic Killer's Bio
- Can't Sit Still Pop a Pill (Part I)
- Avenging Charlie Kirk: The Conservative Redemption of Liberal Academia
- Tennessee and the Return to Common Sense: Historical Education is in Fact Safety
- Top 20 Nations Ranked by 2025 GDP (PPP)
- The American Spectator
- Congress Takes a Holiday from Oversight
- Leibniz and Calhoun: The Christian March of Progress and Postmillennial Truth
- A Seat at the Table, Not Just a Chair in the Room
- National Debt to GDP Ratios Survey
- Venezuela Briefing 9-15-2025
- Now We Must Ask: ‘QUO VADIS” America?
- Ukraine War Update September 22, 2025
- The Direction of American Religion
- Concise Theology in Scripture
Only one Interpretation of Genesis 1 is the Biblical Perspective on Origins
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
There are 10 primary interpretations of Genesis chapter 1, however only one represents a true Biblical perspective on origins. This is because it is the only perspective that starts with the Bible and interprets the chapter based on what it actually says rather than trying to read anything into it. It is also the only one that is fully consistent with the rest of scripture including the rationale of Jesus dying on the cross in payment for our sin.
In this article we will look at all 10 perspectives pointing out the benefits and problems with each of them. We will conclude with pointing out which one is not only the most Biblical, but the only one that can be truly considered to be Biblical in nature,
A Full Estimate of the Odds Against Abiogenesis
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
In determining the probability of abiogenesis occurring it is necessary to break the problem into at least two parts, there may be more, but it always helps to be as generous as possible on this topic because it gives evolutionists less wiggle room. These two parts are the probability of getting the necessary pieces in the same place and time and the odds of getting it assembled into a functioning living cell. Limiting it to these two steps is being extremely generous. This is because as you add steps the probability against it goes up exponentially.
Is Creationism Pseudoscience?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Evolutionists often referred to creationism as pseudoscience. While there are some areas of thought that fall under the legitimate use of the word pseudoscience, it is primarily used in practice as a derogatory term, rather than any legitimate meaning to the word. The question before us is does creationism qualify as a pseudoscience. Do creationists engage in actual scientific activity? Part of the problem turns out to be the way evolution is defined both scientific activity and evidence. It produces the illusion that their side has all the evidence in creationists or any other perspective for that matte,r has none.
Adaptation Versus Universal Common Descent
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Evolutionists will frequently use the word evolution or theory of evolution to refer to two completely different concepts. The first is the adaptation of a species to changes in its environment. This can result in observable changes and is likely responsible for much of the diversity that has developed since the Genesis Flood. The second is universal common descent, which is the totally atheistic idea that all life on earth has developed from a single common ancestor after poofing into existence by processes for which there is no real theory, but all indications is that it is statistically impossible.
Why Do We Need a Creator in the Scientific Age?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
One of the biggest claims that you hear today is that science has eliminated the need for God. This claim is based on the presupposition that science has done away with the need for a creator, or a need for God to explain any phenomenon that is observed. The problem is that with regard to the origin and history of the universe and Earth the presupposition that God was not involved is a critical part of the theoretical system being used. Consequently, the claim that science eliminates the need for God is based on inherently atheistic assumptions.
Yes, Let's Attract the Best and the Brightest
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Intelligent design tends to be overly simplified in what discussions you see in scientific circles. It is frequently derided as a God of the gaps argument despite the fact that it is much more than such a simple argument. The argument can be made that evolutionists are actually making a naturalism of the gaps argument. There are many secrets to intelligent design that are not found in most presentations about it, because the person doing the presentation doesn't want to give it any credibility and in fact is trying to do the exact opposite. Let us look at several secrets of intelligent design that you frequently do not get.
5 Astounding Facts About Creation Science
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Creation science is often attacked by evolutionists for numerous things most of which are just attacks that have no bases, but yet they form an opinion about creation science in general that simply gets repeated. Most people who are convinced that the Big Bang to man evolutionary story is true do so not because of any actual evidence but because that is what they were taught to believe in school, and they simply never questioned it but believe it on 100% blind faith. In most cases what such people think they know about creation science is based entirely on the criticism that they hear from evolutionists. Furthermore, a lot of these people will not even look at creationist material to get an honest perspective about creation science. Here are astounding facts about creation science that you will learn if you take such an honest look.
Big Bang to Man Evolution is Really the View of Origins that Requires Magic
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Evolutionists frequently accuse creationists of having a view of origins that requires magic. Not only is this not true, but it turns out that it is their perspective that actually requires magic. This is because their perspective actually requires violating natural law, where the presence of an intelligent designer prevents such violations. Evolutionists will frequently deny this, but it is clear when you look closely at this essentially atheistic model of origins.
This view of origin starts with the Big Bang, which starts at a singularity. This would literally be a point of no volume but infinite density. What makes this magical is that there is nothing in the model about where the singularity came from or what started the expansion. It is basically a sudden expansion from nothing. Despite trying to apply the laws of physics, it still requires a magical starting point, where we're essentially nothing, suddenly expanding into everything.
The Bait and Switch Use of the Word Evolution
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
There is a lot of science in the discussion of creation versus evolution; however, what is commonly misunderstood is how much the perspective on that science influences one's position. A primary example of this problem is the fact that evolutionists and even some creationists tend to think of creation in terms of fixity of species. This is the old idea that species never change and are always the same; it is, however, easy to show this idea to be in error, so it is often falsely presented as a creationist position. Meanwhile, the term evolution is often applied to both the observed fact that species do change over time as well as universal common descent, which is really the Darwinian view of evolution and the one that is under dispute, as a way of equating these radically different ideas.
Can Science Prove Intelligent Design in Nature?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
There are three ways that the concept of intelligent design in nature comes across in science. The first is the general design of the universe, the second is design within living things, and the final one is design as a requirement for the origin of life. All three of these are a critical part of the issue when it comes to whether or not science can prove intelligent design in nature.
One of the ways of suggesting intelligent design in nature in terms of the general design of the universe is the fine-tuned nature of the universe itself. Now, while some of the factors originally placed under fine-tuning may have broader ranges than originally suspected, many aspects of the universe still require some degree of fine-tuning in order to have a universe capable of supporting life. However, the primary way in which the universe as a whole gives evidence of being intelligently designed is on the subatomic scale, where the properties of particles do not have definite values but exist as waves of probability until observed; only then do these properties obtain actual specific values. Furthermore, the behavior of particles can change based on what we know about them, for example the quantum erasure double slit experiment has shown that whether or not particles behave as particles or waves depends upon whether or not we know if they went through a particular slit or not.
Can Science Explain Miracles?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
The question of can science explain miracles is not an effort to explain them away by providing a naturalistic explanation. Rather, in this case, it is dealing with the question of how they might actually happen. That is a completely different question, and one that is often not asked. In fact, the most common argument against miracles refers to them as magic. What we are exploring here is how science can offer a potential mechanism that allows miracles to occur.
Can Evolution and Intelligent Design Coexist?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
In the debate over origins, evolution and intelligent design Clearly stand as separate sides. Both perspectives have their own reasoning and followers. They're often presented as mutually exclusive, with proponents of one ideology dismissing the other as flawed or even fake. But what if we told you that these two ideas might not be as black and white as they seem?
Intelligent design Is the idea that life contains systems there are far too organized and complex to have been develop by natural processes. This is in part because the odds against being able to acquire and assemble the needed components even on the level of a single cell exceed the number of possible events in the universe by thousands of orders of magnitude. Put simply abiogenesis is statistically impossible, And the only known solution is an intelligent designer. No actual solution to this dilemma has ever actually been proposed. The responses are generally assuming that there must be a problem with your calculations, and they go on to insist on blind faith that there has to be a process that will allow it to work. However, no actual problems with the calculations or a solution that can be demonstrated mathematically to overcome the odds is ever presented.
Does Quantum Physics Prove God Exists?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
The topic of quantum physics is one that has fascinated scientists and others for decades. On the surface, it may seem like a dry, abstract field of study, but scratch beneath the surface and you'll find that it has far-reaching implications for our understanding of the universe. Let’s look quantum physics to see if it holds evidence for God's existence!
Christianity and atheism are not just different views about God, they are actually different views about reality as a whole. Each of these perspectives gives us different ideas as to what we should expect when we look closely at reality. Before looking at what quantum mechanics says about the existence of God need to see what we should expect from both of these views of reality and then compare them to quantum mechanics to see which one is the better fit. Furthermore, we need to look at which direction quantum mechanics naturally tend to lead us when it is properly understood.
Is Embryonic Development Evidence for Universal Common Descent?
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Evolutionists often cite comparative embryology as evidence for universal common descent. This idea originated from recapitulation theory, which assumed fetal development mirrors evolutionary history, but is this really plausible or simply imaginative speculation?
The concept known as recapitulation theory, which posits that fetal development mirrors evolutionary development, was formulated by Étienne Serres in the 1820s, predating Charles Darwin's *Origin of Species* by several decades. This theory was grounded in the earlier work of Johann Friedrich Meckel. Ernest Haeckel, known as Darwin's bulldog, is infamous for promoting evolutionary theory with a fraudulent embryo chart that remained in textbooks long after being debunked.
Science by Judicial Decree
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
What is and is not science is a key issue in the field of philosophy of science. When somebody insists that their activities qualify as science, but others disagree, the best way to settle the question is by open discussion. There are two ways in which this issue should never be settled. The first is by those who insist that the activities are not scientific, forcing their view through the established institutions of mainstream science to prevent discussion. The second is even worse by judicial decree, that is by lawsuit.
Unveiling the Secrets of the Oort cloud
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
If you have any interest in astronomy, you have probably heard of the Oort cloud. It is considered to be a large sphere of comet-like bodies orbiting the Sun and is claimed to be the source of long-period comets. The major problem with all the hype surrounding the Oort cloud is the fact that there is no actual evidence that it even exists.
The only reason why the Oort cloud is thought to exist is because of the fact that we still have long-period and short-period comets. This fact, particularly the short-period comets, is inconsistent with a solar system that is 4.5 billion years old. This was simply a solution proposed to deal with a piece of evidence that naturally points to a young solar system by placing an unobservable reservoir of comets at great distances from the sun.
Browse by the Top Tags ...
