- Ten Toes In: Why Trump Accounts Make Sense for North Carolina's Small Businesses
- Remnant Called -
- Former Moms for Liberty Chairs in South Carolina Address Massive Departure from Organization
- Same Job. Two Résumés. Graham and Norman Make Their Case for the US Senate
- Beyond the Monuments - Finding the Forgotten Grave of Dicey Langston
- Greenville County Holding Public Meetings on 1% Transportation Sales Tax Referendum
- The Myth of Voting for the Lesser of Two Evils
- AIPAC Lobbyists Grip on Congress
- Hunting Island's Lighthouse Was Built to Outsmart the Atlantic's Shifting Shoreline
- South Carolina Gas Tax Climbs From Near Bottom Nationally to 30th in 2026
- Equipping the Persecuted: Weekend Terror Alert Helped Avert Wider Massacre as Slaughter of Christians Continues to Ravage Nigeria Unchecked by Government
- Thurmond and Murkowski Won as Write-Ins. Is This Year’s Senate Race Really the Same?
- Briefing Notes from the Ukraine and Persian Gulf Wars
- Crime Stoppers Luncheon Remembers Greenville’s Fallen While Honoring Those Who Continue to Serve
- Trump Administration Announces $167 Million to Build Rural Care Sites, Upgrade Health Technology, and Strengthen Prevention Across South Carolina
Political
Congress Meddles in Marriage & Contraception
- Details
- By Eagle Forum
Congress Takes Up Broad Bills on Marriage and Contraception
Since the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturned Roe v. Wade, Democrats have been in a tizzy. Not only have they tried to codify Roe into law, but they are also fearmongering about other issues such as same-sex marriage and access to contraception.
When the Supreme Court ruled on Dobbs, the majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito and joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett explicitly stated that it should not be “misunderstood or mischaracterized . . . [to] cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” This signaled that a majority of the Court did not have an appetite to entertain the notion of overturning other precedents at this time.
These Senators Defended Marriage in 2015. What's Changed?
- Details
- By Tony Perkins - The Washington Stand
When the Supreme Court delivered its blow to marriage in 2015, burning down three dozen state laws and tearing up 50 million ballots, the GOP’s reaction was straightforward. Outrage. With a handful of exceptions, the response that echoed across the two coasts was a collective “How dare they?” As far as Republicans were concerned, what the five justices did on that June day was a betrayal of the people, our system of government, and the pillar that’s upheld society since the beginning of time. “It’s an injustice,” they railed. Now, seven years later, they finally have a chance to prove it. The question is: will they?
Keep in mind that when the Supreme Court redefined marriage for America in 2015, we became only the 23rd country out of 195 to do so, and only one of seven to have it imposed on us by a court. Still today, there are only 33 countries that have gone down this path of redefining marriage.
The Truth Hasn't Changed. The GOP Must Defend Marriage.
- Details
- By Tony Perkins - The Washington Stand
If you asked the talking heads, they’d say Americans are flocking to the Republican Party because of Joe Biden. It’s a reasonable explanation, considering the dumpster fire he’s made of our economy, energy, and inflation. But there’s another reason that voters are turning to the GOP — and it has nothing to do with the price of gas in Wichita. It’s because under Donald Trump they rediscovered something important: their moral courage. And this week’s marriage debate, however contrived it is, is putting everything they’ve learned to the test.
South Carolina Paves Bipartisan Path on Election Integrity
- Details
- By Dallas Woodhouse - The Nerve
Editor’s Note: The following article, written by SCPC Executive Director Dallas Woodhouse, was published originally on 7/15/22 by RealClearPolicy, a national website that features U.S. domestic policy analyses by think tanks, associations and foundations.
People across South Carolina have much to celebrate with the Palmetto State’s successful primary election, the first conducted after Republicans and Democrats came together to pass comprehensive voting reform that has expanded the opportunity to cast a ballot, while making that ballot more secure.
South Carolina should serve as a model for the nation. The two major political parties in South Carolina came together and tackled a difficult topic that is roiling other states.
While other state legislatures often have been divided into two camps on election integrity, South Carolina’s General Assembly has proved that expanding early voting and combating fraud can be done at the same time.
No Safe Space: Chemical Abortion and Trafficked Daughters
- Details
- By Tony Perkins - The Washington Stand
My strategy was to be unseen. I became numb. Most abuse victims don’t know they are victims. We just know that this is life. — Darlene, survivor
Darlene was 13 when she was first molested. To this day, she remembers running and hiding under the bed, desperate to disappear. “It just sort of flipped a switch in me, because I had no safe place anymore.” Fatherless, she watched her mom go from one abusive relationship to the next, until one day Darlene just stopped going to school. “That was when my world seemed to completely spiral out of control,” she admits. “[A] guy came to my neighborhood who was so jovial and so friendly to everybody. He was so magnetic is the only thing I can think of. All the kids in the neighborhood gravitated to him — and I had no idea that I was his target.”
Act Quickly to Oppose Biden’s Erasure of Women
- Details
- By Eagle Forum
The left seems confused about the definition of a “woman.” We’ve heard them call the overturn of Roe v. Wade a “war on women.” Meanwhile, the Biden administration is erasing women altogether by allowing biological men to play in women’s sports.
After 50 years of protections for women to access educational programs regardless of biological sex, the Department of Education is upending the rule to cater to the transgender agenda. The language has been expanded to include “sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics.” This means boys will not be denied access to girl’s locker rooms and private spaces.
Settling the Confusion About ERIC
- Details
- By Kat Stansell - American Policy Center
The Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) is advertised as a voter roll maintenance system. As such, it must serve each state in keeping their voter registration lists current, and purged of invalid and ineligible voters. ERIC charges membership fees to do so.
I will show you proof, by the numbers, that ERIC does NOT serve its member states in that capacity.
As you may know, 31* states have joined the group, and pay well for this service.
- Local Elections Are Where the Action Is
- The Exodus Mandate: An Answer To The Crisis In Education That Faces The Christian Church In America Today
- Large percentage of Dems would give U.N. veto power over Supreme Court!
- Blasting CCP Influence, Lawmakers File Bill to Get US Out of UN & WHO
- Religious Freedom Eroding Fast, Warns U.S. Group
- House to Vote on Two Radical Abortion Bills
- Pro-life Leader Calls for Congress and Biden Administration to Condemn Violence Against Life-affirming Centers During Senate Testimony
Browse by the Top Tags ...
