- American Legion Hears about US and China Relations
- Timmons Expresses Support for DEI’s Doppelganger for Hiring Practices in Washington
- Local Republican Leaders Seeking Advice from Democrats
- The Chairman of the Greenville County Republican Party & Co. Vs Republican Party Priorities
- A Puppet Master Entangles His Republican Puppets in Greenville County GOP
- Dale Arterburn for Greenville County Coroner
- Why is Greenville County Council Pickpocketing Us Again?
- Evert’s Electables - GOP Presidential Preference Primary - February 24, 2024
- The 1861 Cherokee Declaration of Independence
- America’s Existential Immigration Crisis
- Yemen and the Houthi Rebels
- Danger: The Proposed South Carolina "Health Czar" Legislation will be Hazardous to Your FREEDOM!
- Adam Morgan Pledges to Support Term Limits on Congress
- Advertising Rates and Specifications
- The Tucker Carlson Interview of Russian President Vladimir Putin
Local Columnists
Sabotage of the Nordstream Natural Gas Pipelines
- By Mike Scruggs
The Darkening Clouds of a Larger War
On September 26, the Swedish National Seismic Institute detected an explosion along the Nordstream 2 Pipeline southeast of the Danish Island of Bornholm in the Baltic Sea. On September 27, a second, stronger blast registering 2.3 on the earthquake scale was registered along Nordstream 1 northeast of the island. The result was one leak on Nordstream 2 and two leaks on Nordstream 1. A fourth leak has now been discovered on Nordstream 2. The German magazine Das Spiegel estimated that explosive damage at each of four leaks was greater than a one-thousand pound aerial bomb or torpedo. Two of the leaks are in Swedish waters and two in Danish waters. The methane environmental catastrophe rising to the surface was first discovered by a Danish Navy helicopter. The degree of damage and the time to fix it has not yet been determined, but it looks like there will be no gas from either pipeline this winter. Fixing the infrastructure and environmental damage under political uncertainty could take years. Based on 2017 statistics, Germany has been getting 40 percent of its natural gas from Nordstream 1. Before we explore the possible perpetrators and motivations of this outrage, it is important to recognize the immense economic investment in the pipelines and future economic and humanitarian consequences.
- Hits: 1845
Annie Moore From Ireland, Who Was All Of 17 Years
- By W.H. Lamb
One of the most divisive issues facing Americans today is the issue of immigration into the U.S. – most especially the truly troubling ILLEGAL variety of immigration! For decades, and probably much longer, we have been faced with the specter of hordes of “undocumented” invaders crossing over our borders, or overstaying their visas, for sundry purposes -- ostensibly to seek a better life for themselves and their children-- and become “WARDS OF THE STATE” far too often, and in some cases to infiltrate their poisonous hatred of our relatively free American culture into our body politic, as they seek to extend their insane and Satanically-induced Islamic or Chinese Communist Party beliefs and violence from their own despotic nests of snakes into our freedom-oriented land.
- Hits: 1503
Never Let a Devastating Natural Disaster Go To Waste
- By David Harsanyi
Be prepared for Democrats to exploit the devastation of Hurricane Ian to peddle de-modernization. And because there is no conclusive way for anyone to prove that global warming isn't triggering every natural disaster -- and because nature offers a continuous flow of these terrifying events and always will -- the exploitation will never stop.
- Hits: 932
The Label of Pseudoscience
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
Pseudoscience is a term evolutionists like to use against creation science. It is a derogatory term frequently used against any concept that disagrees with those concepts that are widely held by institutionalized science. It is largely a way of trying to keep the designation of science within institutionalized science.
The word “pseudoscience” basically means fake science and it has two legitimate uses. The first is deliberate fraud on the part of the proponents. The second legitimate use of this term is in referring to fictional science. For example, inventing some scientifically sounding terminology in a science fiction story to make what is going on at least sound scientific.
- Hits: 1063
Understanding the Russia-Ukraine War
- By Mike Scruggs
Essential Clarifying Background
Many Americans see the Russia-Ukraine War as an extension of the 1945-1991 Cold War that pitted the U.S. and its NATO alliance against the former Soviet Union. The smaller Russian Federation that succeeded the former Soviet Union, however, is not the Communist Soviet Union. Communism was rejected by the Russian Federation, which strives for economic growth through a freer more capitalistic economy with a more democratized political system. These economic and democratic reforms are far from perfect. Abruptly transitioning from corrupt totalitarian Communism to a freer society seeking the public good was a mountainous task and that task is still ongoing.
- Hits: 1803
Auschwitz Prisoner #4859
- By W.H. Lamb
I’ve used the following sources to tell this true tale of almost unspeakable heroism, from which I learned of this story and from which I quote freely and paraphrase in my own words: 1) Transcript of a 2010 report about Witold Pilecki by National Public Radio; 2) Wikipedia; 3) Jewish Virtual Library.
- Hits: 1506
The Label of Science Denier
- By Charles Creager, Jr.
The science denier labeled is Ad hominem (personal attack) that harkens back to Holocaust deniers, who were Nazi sympathizers that denied the reality of the Holocaust despite the overwhelming evidence. So basically, the use of the label is comparing creationists and Nazi sympathizers.
The notion behind this label is that the person using it thinks that a particular theory is an irrefutable science and that consequently, anyone who disagrees with it is simply denying it. This ignores the fact that there can be legitimate reasons for questioning even well-established scientific principles. One possibility is that the person to which they are applying the label has not had the concept presented to them properly. Another legitimate reason would be they do not trust the concept because of who is pushing the idea, climate change is a good example of this. The third legitimate reason is that they see possible flaws in the idea. Whether or not they are correct is a different matter, but you are not going to convince someone that they are mistaken about something by calling them names.
- Hits: 1170
- Conservative Victory in Sweden
- Getting The United States Out Of The United Nations and the United Nations Out Of The United States: Is It Possible? – Part 3
- The Label of Anti-Science
- Putin’s Russian Economy - Eastern Economic Forum
- Getting The United States Out Of The United Nations, And The United Nations Out Of The United States: Is It Possible? - Part 2
- Championing Opportunity is a Winning Strategy for Democrats
- Welcome to the Green New Deal, California
Subcategories