- Ten Toes In: Why Trump Accounts Make Sense for North Carolina's Small Businesses
- Remnant Called -
- Former Moms for Liberty Chairs in South Carolina Address Massive Departure from Organization
- Same Job. Two Résumés. Graham and Norman Make Their Case for the US Senate
- Beyond the Monuments - Finding the Forgotten Grave of Dicey Langston
- Greenville County Holding Public Meetings on 1% Transportation Sales Tax Referendum
- The Myth of Voting for the Lesser of Two Evils
- AIPAC Lobbyists Grip on Congress
- Hunting Island's Lighthouse Was Built to Outsmart the Atlantic's Shifting Shoreline
- South Carolina Gas Tax Climbs From Near Bottom Nationally to 30th in 2026
- Equipping the Persecuted: Weekend Terror Alert Helped Avert Wider Massacre as Slaughter of Christians Continues to Ravage Nigeria Unchecked by Government
- Briefing Notes from the Ukraine and Persian Gulf Wars
- Thurmond and Murkowski Won as Write-Ins. Is This Year’s Senate Race Really the Same?
- Crime Stoppers Luncheon Remembers Greenville’s Fallen While Honoring Those Who Continue to Serve
- Trump Administration Announces $167 Million to Build Rural Care Sites, Upgrade Health Technology, and Strengthen Prevention Across South Carolina
Political
Convention of States: An Amendment Would Force the Feds to Stop Spending Our Money
- Details
- By Joe Wolverton, II, J.D. - The New American

My final article examining the Convention of States’ (COS) “7 Guidelines for Drafting Proposed Amendments” concerns their mandate that any amendment submitted to them for consideration by those attending their convention has to have one of the following purposes:
- Impose fiscal restraints on the federal government
- Limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government
- Impose term limits on federal officials
As I’ve exposed the redundancy and inanity of the last and next to last, today I’ll do likewise to the first: impose fiscal restraints on the federal government.
Let’s put the most important consideration first: the U.S. Constitution.
Senate Supreme Court Ethics Bill Places Conservative Justices in Democrats’ Crosshairs
- Details
- By Press Release
Supreme Court Ethics Bill is Unethical

In yet another attempt to delegitimatize the Supreme Court, Senate Democrats have moved forward with a bill they say would tighten ethics requirements for its Justices. The Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency “SCERT” Act (S. 359) is not intended to hold those serving on the Court accountable for their actions or to close some nefarious loophole. In the words of Carrie Severino writing in National Review, “The legislation builds on the torrent of pseudo-ethics issues designed to destroy a Supreme Court whose recent decisions the Left finds disagreeable. The hand-wringing over ethics on Capitol Hill transparently employs double standards to single out conservative justices and ignore the liberal ones, fueled by incompetent journalism that fudges facts and routinely fails to find a single case in which one of its targets was corrupted.”
Zero Hunger (SDG 2) Means Starvation for All?!
- Details
- By Lynne M Taylor - American Policy Center

If you’re familiar with Tom DeWeese’s extensive work on Agenda 21 (now Agenda 2030), you certainly are aware of the United Nations’ SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals). The “Goals” are a railroading system being used to force all nations into compliance. The United States is NO exception.
What better way to do that, than by controlling our food supplies? This includes the water and land which grow our crops and feed our livestock. It also will overtake EVERYTHING in agriculture, food sales, food deliveries, and quite possibly even your own backyard gardens.
Patching Georgia's Voting System Will Not Secure Our Elections
- Details
- By VoterGA
ATLANTA -- As a few Georgia politicians begin advocating that Georgia's Dominion voting system be patched to address massive security and inaccuracy concerns, VoterGA expounded today upon its position that a patch from version 5.5 to 5.17 will not secure Georgia's 2024 elections nor ensure the accuracy of 2024 results because:
Stanton Healthcare Sees Increase of Clients and Services for Women Facing Unexpected Pregnancies in a Post-Roe America
- Details
- By Christian Newswire
BOISE, Idaho -- Since Roe v. Wade has been overturned, Stanton Healthcare has seen its office visits increase by 67%, website traffic increase by 124%, phone calls by 119%, and supply requests by 37%.
Stanton Healthcare is a women's healthcare clinic that specializes in serving women with unexpected pregnancies by providing professional medical care, practical and emotional support, women's wellness care, and a special outreach to refugee and marginalized communities. Stanton Healthcare is based in Idaho with affiliates in the U.S. and internationally.
During the same time period, Planned Parenthood has downsized its national staff by 15% while life-affirming centers across America are expanding their services for women and children.
Biden White House to Oust Conservative Reporters from Press Briefings
- Details
- By S.A. McCarthy - The Washington Stand

Amidst growing concerns over censorship, the Biden White House is changing its rules on press credentials, potentially forcing conservative reporters out of the briefing room.
According to the new rules, White House reporters must hold a press pass from the U.S. House of Representatives, Senate, or Supreme Court to maintain access to the White House briefing room. Starting July 31, existing White House “hard passes” will expire, leaving several reporters without access to press briefings. One such reporter is Fred Lucas, White House correspondent for The Heritage Foundation’s news outlet The Daily Signal. Lucas has held a hard pass since 2009 and has covered both Obama’s and Trump’s presidencies; in two weeks, Lucas will be without a White House press pass.
U.S. House Passes Defense Bill to Undo Wokeism in the Military
- Details
- By Eagle Forum
In Defense of Our Nation’s Defenders

Last week the House Republicans began the process to eliminate many of the woke policies the Left has been forcing on the U.S. military for years. Historically, the reauthorization of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has been bipartisan, but the previous Democrat majority attempted to insert their agenda with language to provide on-demand abortions, taxpayer funded transition surgeries for transgenders, vaccine mandates, and drafting our daughters. This year, House conservatives are defending the armed services by making it clear our military is not to be used for radical social experimentation.
- Is Our Constitution in Jeopardy?
- RFK Jr. Pleads with Fellow Democrats for More Civility and Less Censorship
- Should Legal Documents Be Accurate?
- Tucker Carlson: Life, Death, Power, the CIA & the End of Journalism
- No US Military Intervention in Ukraine
- PTA Pushing Transgender Ideology: The Parent Teacher Association Turns on Parents
- South Dakota Farmers Face Carbon-capture Land Theft

