Some are driven to just believe whatever the doctor / lawyer / judge / preacher / talking-head says. The fact that we must resort to “alternative media” platforms to publish inconvenient truths is evidence that most just tend to flow the direction of the current, not actively engaged in critical thinking but tending to believe the “authorities.” No matter that the struggle of mankind since Adam and Eve engaged with the serpent has been obedience to God’s call to use the gifts that He gave us, including a reasoning, thinking mind, to uncover the truth about the claims that confront us. It was, therefore, only a matter of time before a defender of the status quo would arise to challenge this writer’s challenges to the allegations of a real pandemic, driven by a real virus, and being fought by a real vaccine. As has been clearly stated here over the past few weeks, none of that is true, but don’t just take my word for it.

Mike Adams at Natural News reports that, though he himself started out a skeptic of the skeptics , he kept digging and discovered the truth for himself – that “the medical and scientific establishment has fabricated all this” - that “common cold viruses and monkey virus fragments found in flu shots are being mislabeled ‘covid,’ and there is a weaponized spike protein bioweapon that’s being distributed via vaccine injections” - that “there’s no such thing as a real, physical, isolated covid-19 virus that has been harvested from sick people and shown to infect other people and make them sick.”

Adams, himself a “lab owner, published scientist and mass spec analyst,” states that there are “no isolated, purified Certified Reference Materials available for SARS-CoV-2 ‘covid’.” … “The covid virus isn’t isolated. In fact, (what companies are selling as) “isolate” contains viral genetic material, human genetic material and bovine genetic material, plus whatever other viruses were present in the blood of the people and the cows. This could be millions of different nanoparticles present, each containing their own sequences of genetic material.”

Adams continues: “If you have no isolated, certified reference materials, you can’t develop a legitimate analysis test. And this is exactly what the FDA admits in its own documents, which state that since covid-19 viruses weren’t available for the development of the PCR test, they 'simulated' it by using human cells and gene bank coronavirus fragments. From the FDA’s own document:

“‘Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA … spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.’

“In other words, they faked the covid virus by using gene bank cells which were deliberately and falsely labeled 'covid.’ This is how the PCR test was developed. The FDA admits it all. The PCR test is a fraud.”

Read the rest of Adams’ article at:

Saeed A. Qureshi, Ph.D., points out that what some call “isolates” are, in fact, not isolates at all. They are not VIRUS ALONE, which means they are not ISOLATES. “The made-up definition of 'virus-isolation' makes the story of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, its infection, and pandemic very clear, i.e., nothing is real about them, but all are fake. No one has seen the virus, found it, or isolated it as claimed. It is all bogus. … [A]s the pure virus has never been isolated, one cannot have reference standards and calibrators; hence all the claimed experimentation becomes scientifically null and void, reflecting a fraud.” 

“Like the virus's assumed existence, it is further assumed that the associated disease (COVID-19) exists, is contagious, spreading uncontrollably, and potentially people are dying or will die in large numbers. There is no available scientific evidence to support these claims except counting the false positive test results, obtained mostly from the non-validated and false, PCR test.”

Read Qureshi’s article at:

BDBINC challenges the petrochemical pharmaceutical cartel with “‘CovID19’ is not real” at Refute it, point by point, if you can.

Christine Massey has completed much real scientific research that also cannot be refuted. In spite of months of research and dozens of FOIA request submissions, she could unearth not a single institution that could produce “even 1 record describing the actual isolation of any ‘SARS-COV-2’ from a patient sample by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever.” (See

John Carleton shows us Massey’s letter from the CDC stating that CDC does not isolate viruses when they call them “isolates.” (See

It is doubtful that any writer / researcher has done more to get to the bottom of the COVID claims than investigative reporter and Pulitzer Prize nominee Jon Rappoport. In hundreds of articles over the past couple of years, Rappoport has laid it out for all to see and for anyone to challenge with factual evidence. One year ago, Rappoport cited Dr. Wu Zunyou, chief epidemiologist at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, when Zunyou clearly stated, “They didn’t isolate the virus.” (See

Dr. David Martin, PhD, has told us that what they’re calling “COVID-19” is nothing new but is part of a plan to get the entire earth’s population hooked on mRNA as a method of gene therapy. (See

“COVID” does not exist. “In fact, all of the leading scientists on COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) have admitted that the scientific rules to prove COVID-19 have not been established.” (

“It is important to note that there is no scientific evidence showing that SARS-CoV-2 is causing the illness. It cannot be shown because the virus (SARS-CoV-2) is neither available nor exists, as noted above. Hence, its link to the disease cannot be established. It would be safe to confirm now that the COVID-19 is a hoax.” (

People want to believe what they believe. They are embarrassed to admit that what they have held onto as “factual” is, in truth, not fact at all. They are upset to discover that their way of thinking is just flat-out wrong. But when they run up against someone who challenges their beliefs – whether it be a Nathan, a Rush Limbaugh, or even a Donald Trump (who has, for some inexplicable reason, been completely wrong on the subject of the plannedemic) - intellectual honesty and scientific integrity demands that they stop, go back to square one, and seriously re-evaluate whether or not what they thought were facts are actually true.

You have no rights to post comments

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive